Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Distribution Company

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh 666 07:49, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

International Distribution Company

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Stub that fails WP:NCOMPANY, WP:NOTYELLOWPAGES, see also WP:CORPSPAM. Previously prodded by User:Atlantic306, did not improve much since. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:36, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 09:03, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! ^{Babymissfortune} 09:03, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment possible merge to Summit Entertainment or Lionsgate as there is not enough content/notability for a stand alone article Atlantic306 (talk) 16:38, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:55, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- film distribution companies are rarely notable and this one misses the mark by a mile. There's nothing to merge as the article lists no sources. Not sufficiently notable for a redirect, in any case. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:32, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.