Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intercultural Reflective Language Teacher

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:24, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Intercultural Reflective Language Teacher

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any mention of this online, and judging from the fourth footnote in the article the concept seems to be original research. I doubt that sources exist to prove it passes the general notability guideline. — Mr. Stradivarius on tour ^{(have a chat)} 03:35, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. — Mr. Stradivarius on tour ^{(have a chat)} 03:43, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. — Mr. Stradivarius on tour ^{(have a chat)} 03:43, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as original research. I can find no mention of the title in MLA, ERIC, EBSCO Academic Search Premier, or Google Scholar. The article seems like a summary of discussions among scholars at University of Pennsylvania and Jönköping University, which don't appear to have been published. Cnilep (talk) 04:36, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 14:06, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 01:12, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
delete blatant original research, no reliable sources. LibStar (talk) 15:17, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.