Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Institute of Lens Arts Australia
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:18, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Institute of Lens Arts Australia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
After being de-PRODded and improved, I still think the added sources do not satisfy the WP:N criteria. Most of the sources are either primary (interviews, business listings) or unreliable (LinkedIn, Facebook). More secondary, reliable sources are needed to prove its notability, and, as said in the PROD request, I could not find any sources like that. CorrectionsJackal (correct me) 09:07, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Schools, and Australia. CorrectionsJackal (correct me) 09:07, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
- Strong delete Not even 1 google news or books hit. Fails WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 22:34, 26 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. Couldn't find anything on Proquest, Google Scholar or Google Books. There are a couple of sources that verify it existed, but nothing useful for notability. MCE89 (talk) 13:15, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.