Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inkswel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:43, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Inkswel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a musician, not properly referenced as passing WP:NMUSIC. The notability claim here is that he and his work exist, with no indication of any particular distinctions such as awards or chart success, and the referencing is parked almost entirely on unreliable sources that are not support for notability -- fully half of the footnotes here are to discogs.com directory entries, and then there's promotional content self-published by himself or his own record label, blogs and Q&A interviews in which he's talking about himself in the first person -- literally the only thing here that comes close to being acceptable support for notability (Flood) is a short blurb, not substantive enough to singlehandedly carry passage of GNG all by itself if all of the other sourcing around it is junk. Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have better referencing than this. Bearcat (talk) 16:29, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.