Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Icertis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 17:30, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Icertis

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Organization has been around since 2009 and the best sources are still about routine startup funding rounds? There's no demonstration of sustained, in-depth coverage per WP:CORPDEPTH. ☆ Bri (talk) 18:16, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:21, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:21, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ceethekreator (talk) 13:48, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep For the purposes of references to establish notability, analyst reports are deemed acceptable. This company has been covered by both Forrester and WBR Insights and has also been written about by Gartner. Topic therefore meets GNG/NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 15:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:01, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.