Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IObit
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:47, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
- IObit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Only exist to promote the product and company as well. non-notable. Light2021 (talk) 17:45, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:25, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:25, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete -- WP:PROMO on an unremarkable private company. A minor controversy does not really help. Sources are trivial or passing mentions. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:34, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing++ 11:28, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.