Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hunter Foote

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 14:59, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hunter Foote

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:Notability Sources given are local, indicating notability only among a local community. Heavily edited either by the subject or somebody closely associated with the subject. Written in a very promotional and non neutral style. Safiel (talk) 03:53, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:MUSIC. May have WP:AUTO, WP:COI, and WP:SPA problems as well. Qworty (talk) 03:56, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:57, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:21, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 10:24, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Searching a library database of newspaper and magazine articles, I was not able to find any sources that would help support WP:N notability. Sourcing on the article consists of directory listings, e.g. at music festivals, not meeting the "independent" requirement. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 03:18, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.