Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Howie scream (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Stock sound effect. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:16, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Howie scream

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sourcing found Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:24, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:04, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:04, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:04, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: There are quite a few unreliable sources about this scream, but this and this seem to be reliable. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 00:18, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the above; reliable sources have been found ~~and incorporated into the article~~. Due to the pages' size, however, I would not be against merging the links in Template:Stock sound effects into one article, but all of their content must be kept. Modernponderer (talk) 14:20, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like the sources currently used in the article are not in fact the same ones as those mentioned above, but per WP:ARTN, the rest of my opinion remains unchanged. Modernponderer (talk) 15:45, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A merge to stock sound effect would seem the most appropriate avenue. Great job with the expansion and addition of sources. Not sure if it is enough to support it having its own article, but the entire paragraph and maybe even the sound file can be merged. Aoba47 (talk) 00:01, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947 05:06, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

merge For the above reasons. Keep all content and redirect link. Endercase (talk) 08:17, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per others. It definitely exists, but there does not seem to be sufficient coverage about it to go beyond just a Stub-class article. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 11:58, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to stock sound effect, per Aoba47; I cannot find any additional news sources and books. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 15:29, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.