Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hookson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:14, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hookson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sorry but this is a non notable marketing agency who have created their own article and it clearly fails WP:GNG Theroadislong (talk) 16:01, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 00:36, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 00:36, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 00:36, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 21:37, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - so its a company that does stuff, mostly releasing press releases, and it once got sacked by the church of scotland for announcing their relationship without permission - encyclopedic and notable? not per WP:GNG ---- _nonsense ferret 02:21, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- reads too like an ADVERT to me. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:48, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.