Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hinterlands of Khuresh
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 05:50, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Hinterlands of Khuresh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
My primary concern is the fact that this article lacks any sources whatsoever (since 2007!). Furthermore the subject of the article fails to fulfil the Notability requirements, more specifically WP:NRVE. Another policy that also applies is WP:NOTMANUAL (Wikipedia is not a sourcebook for a fictional setting). The subject is largely unimportant for the fictional setting itself, not being one of the major fictional political factions. The subject is already mentioned in a short and proper fashion in the article Races and nations of Warhammer Fantasy#The North, East, and South and that should be more than enough. This article is IMHO just another example of WP:Fancruft. Thank you for your attention. Flamarande (talk) 14:04, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:18, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:49, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 14:10, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No sources let alone secondary sources (and thus fails to meet WP:GNG), and much of the text smacks of WP:OR. Sure, I might draw the same conclusions about the inspiration and history of the Hinterlands, but that's OR; do any secondary sources make these observations? Where is this coming from? - Sangrolu (talk) 13:33, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Again, WP:GAMEGUIDE is invoked inappropriately by a nom for a gaming AfD; nothing in this article or the last Warhammer setting book AfD resembles a how-to guide for the game. Just because someone writes about a game doesn't make it a gameguide; inasmuch as fictional settings are written about for a game (and meet the notability guidelines), they can be in wikipedia just as much as Middle-earth, Pern, etc. - Sangrolu (talk) 13:33, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.