Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helmes AS (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:56, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Helmes AS

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Second nomination. It's been several years but there are still not several independent reliable sources satisfying WP:CORP. JFHJr (㊟) 04:23, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Estonia. AllyD (talk) 08:25, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is all I can find [1], about some unsavory business dealings they were involved with. Nothing upon which we can build an article. Article as it reads now is PROMO. Oaktree b (talk) 19:39, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A peacockery-laden article about a company, created by a single-day account a couple of months after a previous instance was deleted at AfD. Searches find announcement-based coverage of new contracts, acquisitions of similar firms in Lithuania and Belarus, but these fall under trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH. Neither these nor involvement in the case mentioned above is sufficient to demonstrate notability; the previous AfD consensus should stand. AllyD (talk) 11:26, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The article itself is blatantly promotional, and the cited sources are promotional pieces, entry on database, and company's own websites. While the company was mentioned in some websites and articles, none of those are in-depth coverage sufficient in proving its notability. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 21:18, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: blatantly promotional, non-notable, and unsourced. DrowssapSMM (talk) 21:20, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.