Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hall.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Atlassian, as the relevant merge has been performed already. The editors arguing for deletion have not made a persuasive case against a redirect, which are WP:CHEAP after all. A Train^talk 09:40, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hall.com

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non significant product. Nothing on media except typical press coverage. Speedy delete material. Light2021 (talk) 15:05, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:36, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:36, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:36, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Atlassian, which acquired Hall.com in 2015 (source). This will improve the Atlassian article, which presently has no mention about Hall.com at all, as per WP:ATD-M. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:06, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as considering all of the current coverage, we have only clear company announcements, certainly not enough to satisfy our set policies WP:What Wikipedia is not, WP:Not webhost and WP:Promo; of which are non-negotiable and merging could not solve the still existing promotionalism. Such content is best deleted and then merged at whatever amount necessary and especially considering the merged content would basically be 1 sentence. GNG is not a factor here given it has no serious weight against policies, and GNG alone discounts press releases as viable options. SwisterTwister talk 13:17, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – When articles are deleted first, merges very rarely occur afterward. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:15, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- notability not established; there's nothing to merge as the suggested target would not be improved by the content / sources currently present in the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:18, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Merge or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:06, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Atlassian#Acquisitions_and_product_announcements; I added something about the takeover there. (Although the name of the company seems to be Hall, not Hall.com, I'm assuming it's under this name for some reason.) --Colapeninsula (talk) 12:31, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/Redirect per above. Sources fail WP:CORPDEPTH. shoy (reactions) 12:53, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and not Redirect. Info has already been added to the Arlassian article. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 16:06, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.