Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gymternet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:11, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gymternet

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not sure if this is particularly notable internet slang. Comments? | Naypta^talk opened his mouth at 16:35, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Naypta: "Not sure if this is particularly notable" is not a good reason to put something up for deletion, AfD should be a last resort for non-notable articles. Saying that, I believe this article is non-notable, and fails WP:NOTADICTIONARY and WP:GNG, and so I support Delete. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:37, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Joseph2302: That's my point, apologies if the language I used wasn't showing what I meant. I did mean that it wasn't notable. :) | Naypta^talk opened his mouth at 16:40, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Naypta: I agree, i would point out though that 'Gymternet' is already the name of a site for gym fanatics. Not quite what the article says. Definitely not notable internet slang. Delete. BrookDaCow

Delete: WP:NOTADICTIONARY ubiquity (talk) 16:48, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails GNG. If I recall correcly we just had an AfD about the girl who runs the "Gymternet" blog and it was deleted. Note they mention her in this article and refer to her as "renowned gymnastics blogger, Lauren Hopkins." Same person probably wrote both articles. —Мандичка^YO 😜 08:36, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:NAD. --Jersey92 (talk) 16:33, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:37, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:37, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:37, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - WP:NEO. Bearian (talk)
Delete. as neologism. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 18:21, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary#NEO Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:43, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.