Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guiffy SureMerge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 05:01, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Guiffy SureMerge

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable paid software product; fails WP:NPROD. The "reviews" only briefly describe the software features without any independent analysis. The only independent coverage is three sentences here, not enough for WP:NPROD. I couldn't find any other non-trivial coverage. Undeleted in 2014 after PROD. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 06:37, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products, Computing, and Software. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 06:37, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I found the original download.cnet.com staff review here, but a single one-paragraph review is not enough for WP:NPROD. Again, the Tucows sources only list a few software features rather than independently reviewing the product. If kept, the article should be moved to Guiffy eXpert, since the reviews are about the entire software bundle. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 20:46, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:PROMO. Caleb Stanford (talk) 00:07, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:19, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Lacks WP:SIGCOV in WP:RS. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 00:42, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.