Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gu Chujun
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Ronhjones (Talk) 01:39, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Gu Chujun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Just wealth isn't itself sufficient for notability, I think. Note that I've found some suggestion that he had been arrested and charge with fraud,[1] but I don't think that in itself creates notability, either. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 21:12, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I've made small edits to the page to include the information that makes him notable: once the 20th richest man in China, and more importantly, 12 years in the slammer for corporate fraud. There's sources there from Time Magazine, Reuters, etc. I'm sure there is more out there to expand the article, but in my view this is a very obvious keep. --Mkativerata (talk) 21:53, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:28, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:28, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:29, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WP:GNG. His wealth, arrest/conviction, or holding prominent positions with major companies has been covered in reliable sources. Location (talk) 23:52, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per coverage in WP:RS meeting WP:GNG. Andrea105 (talk) 00:17, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.