Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gridbeyond

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Goldsztajn (talk) 11:33, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gridbeyond

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite the attempt to make it seem otherwise, there is no useful coverage of the article subject I could find, and citing 4 copies of every press release (or churnalism of the same) about a funding round or a new contract signed does not make for an encyclopedic article. Alpha3031 (t • c) 07:42, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Environment, Technology, and Ireland. Alpha3031 (t • c) 07:42, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom; nothing right now to indicate notability, WP:SIGCOV is not met (regurgitated press releases don't count.) Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 11:17, 26 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. WP:NCORP isn't met. My own WP:BEFORE searches return the same coverage we see in the article. Which, per nom, are the same "reprinted press releases about funding rounds" churnalism (mostly from Apr/May 2024 and incl RTÉ, The Currency, etc) we might expect to see for just about any similar-stage startup/scaleup. While my own BEFORE searches also return further coverage (from Oct/Nov 2024 and incl RTÉ, Silicon Republic, Business Post, etc) it is also of the "republished press releases about funding" variety common for just about any similar stage company. It is not independent or in-depth coverage. (FYI: I considered recommending "draftify", but the SPA/PAID/COI/REFBOMB patterns, evident in the title's creation, are difficult to overlook....) Guliolopez (talk) 13:14, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.