Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Go Shooter
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to List of Transformers: Chojin Masterforce characters. T. Canens (talk) 03:33, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Go Shooter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fictional character with no apparent independent notability or significant third-party sources. Black Kite (t) (c) 23:13, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment A previous nomination containing this character was closed on the 10th of September, just over two weeks ago. Why is this up for deletion again so soon? --Malkinann (talk) 23:44, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and Reply Because the last nomination had no consensus. This character lacks the notability and coverage to have his own article. DragonZero (talk · contribs) 00:01, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- If the last AFD had no consensus, why is there any reason to suspect that this AFD, just over two weeks later, will have a consensus? Where do you recommend the article be merged to? --Malkinann (talk) 00:04, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I thought there would be a list of characters somewhere. I'm just passing by and assessing unassessed articles. If there's no character list, someone should make one. A lazy creation would be copying and pasting the information to all the articles that were suggested for merge in the previous nomination. DragonZero (talk · contribs) 00:11, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- If the last AFD had no consensus, why is there any reason to suspect that this AFD, just over two weeks later, will have a consensus? Where do you recommend the article be merged to? --Malkinann (talk) 00:04, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and Reply Because the last nomination had no consensus. This character lacks the notability and coverage to have his own article. DragonZero (talk · contribs) 00:01, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge - This is definitely unnotable character. The information would stand better in the List of Transformers: Chojin Masterforce characters page. How is everybody overlooking this? Sarujo (talk) 05:08, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into List of Transformers: Chojin Masterforce characters as we do with all other non-notable character articles. Seriously, aren't other options to cleanup the Transformers articles even being considered before nominating them for deletion. Especially since this article was nominated two weeks prior AfD? —Farix (t | c) 12:52, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge this into the list. Individual notability can't be established here, and the sourcing is bad. AniMate 20:08, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to the list per TheFarix and Sarujo. Please stop overlooking the character lists. Thank you. --Divebomb (talk) 12:44, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge- better to go character list. Dwanyewest (talk) 11:24, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.