Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghulam Haider Blogger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 08:01, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ghulam Haider Blogger

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable blogger. All references are to self-published and/or non reliable sources. Witty lama 11:58, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 12:10, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:57, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:57, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:57, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: another article on this person was recently deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghulam Haider (Blogger). Hut 8.5 22:42, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article listed above has now been deleted. SwisterTwister talk 06:37, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as this basically has the exact fate as the other AfD, nothing to suggest even minimally better notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:37, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The article appears promotional. no reliable sources. The article fails to establish notability of this living person, who on current evidence does not meet WP:ANYBIO, WP:CREATIVE or WP:GNG. Drchriswilliams (talk) 20:09, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable bloggers.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:16, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.