Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghulam Haider (Blogger)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 00:06, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ghulam Haider (Blogger)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of reliable sources; dubious notability. —Swpb^talk 14:43, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 14:54, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 14:54, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete with Speedy A7--Musa Talk 14:56, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"was awarded the Best Pakistani Blogger of 2014 by the Punjab Government officials" is a credible claim of significance, so A7 cannot be applied. If I could have, I would have. —Swpb^talk 17:37, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per nominator Umais Bin Sajjad (talk) 15:08, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable for stand-alone article. Kierzek (talk) 15:35, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Request snow!! - Simply nothing to show notability that would come close to WP:GNG. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:14, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - does not meet WP:GNG, WP:AUTHOR or WP:ENT. --bonadea contributions talk 13:15, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.