Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaza: Still Alive

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Left guide (talk) 03:33, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gaza: Still Alive

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability backed up by WP:RS. Amigao (talk) 03:47, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Television, Israel, and Palestine. jolielover♥talk 04:07, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It does have notable independent sources from RT (TV Network), Washington Report on Middle East Affairs and Anadolu Ajansı. M A A Z T A L K 09:15, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A fully deprecated source like WP:RT.COM and a WP:GUNREL source like WP:AAPOLITICS would not be considered independent sources. - Amigao (talk) 18:39, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There are several independent sources including Vice news, Middle East Monitor, Researchgate and 3CR Melbourne. M A A Z T A L K 00:07, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I see significant independent critical coverage on the page. e.ux 10:28, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Maaz Thanks, 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 East ernsa hara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 01:48, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as there would appear to be enough here to pass WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. Iljhgtn (talk) 00:15, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.