Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gainsight

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 19:05, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gainsight

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable company. References are nothing more than normal press releases Jupitus Smart 18:45, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 18:45, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 18:45, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails NCORP. --qedk (t 桜 c) 19:36, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NCORP. Sources provided are either connected to the company or lack WP:SIGCOV in the case of Bloomberg, the source being mostly a database entry. Bkissin (talk) 20:31, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:53, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:53, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NCORP. No significant coverage. William2001^(talk) 22:09, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.