Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GWU Recess

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:REFUND applies. MBisanz ^talk 03:08, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GWU Recess

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, no significant coverage in independent reliable sources– references are either brief mentions of the organization or from GWU student publications. -- Wikipedical (talk) 00:23, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 05:38, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 05:38, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 05:38, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 05:38, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment see also previous WP:Articles for deletion/ReceSs. The Mighty Glen (talk) 05:40, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I can find passing mentions of the subject in recent publications. --Donald Trung (Talk) (Articles) Respect mobile users. 09:41, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- There are mentions but no significant coverage in reliable sources since the last AFD closed as ‘delete’ 10+ years ago. -- Wikipedical (talk) 12:38, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG. If it were a multi-campus organization with chapters nationally, and secondary sourced, it'd be fine, but this is evidently a monthly improv group at a single university. Not notable. _{Vermont | reply here} 22:31, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.