Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fushitsusha

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 19:15, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fushitsusha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notable? GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 05:44, 9 November 2021 (UTC) Japanese experimental rock band with questionable notability, in my opinion. The cited sources include many dead links and unreliable looking sites. While there is a biography page on Allmusic, it is a general consensus that AM does not necessarily establish notability. During a google search I couldn't find anything better either except a concert review in NYT which I find surprising. But even if Allmusic is considered to be a reliable source, we have two reliable sources but that's not much, and like I said I couldn't find anything else other than the usual stuff (databases, youtube, fansites, trivial mentions...) They don't have an article on the Japanese Wikipedia either. Offline sources might be available but I can't access them. Thoughts? GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 05:42, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Chicago Reader is great. I have talked about Allmusic in my nomination, I don't know any more if it is reliable or not. On huwiki it counts as a reliable source, but only if there is a biography or, in the case of albums, a staff-written review. There is one, I know, but I don't really know about Allmusic any more around here... GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 18:25, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:28, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 11:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.