Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred Zeppelin (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Tributes to Led Zeppelin . not my field, but the consensus is clear. DGG ( talk ) 02:13, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fred Zeppelin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Some local coverage is not enough to sustain an article, let alone a puff piece. Drmies (talk) 21:02, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 22:23, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Merge/redirect, per Arxilos below. Ghits seem to turn up primary sources or small routine gig listings where copy is mostly drawn from their press kit. Please also beware of false positives: the name seems to have used for a couple of different entertainers and projects in the US, including an unrelated early 80's tribute band with a young Dweezil Zappa. Working at it the other way, it did seem to be easy to find sources and even video of Robert Plant and Jimmy Page praising other tribute bands, such as Dread Zeppelin and Letz Zep. Fails WP:GNG for lack of substantial coverage by reliable sources. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 10:54, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep (for the edit history) but then merge/redirect to Tributes to Led Zeppelin (assuming that article is kept under some name). I think the overall topic of Zeppelin tribute bands is notable enough for an article, and this one should be part of it. --Arxiloxos (talk)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge as per above- interesting as a set of articles, but not as a single band. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Braniff747SP (talk • contribs) 20:46, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.