Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fraudsourcing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 11:06, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fraudsourcing

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable neologism made up by a non-notable author in an unreliable publication (WordPress). Other than the two links the article no reliable coverage of any kind was found. I previously prodded it, but author removed it without any reason given. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 23:57, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Might even want to request a speedy. If we all got Wikipedia pages for making up words, I'd have six. Sidatio (talk) 01:29, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Lacks adequate sources and is a non-notable neologism. - Mr X 02:24, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Dictionary definition of an obscure neologism. The citation in the article is a self-published source and is thus unreliable. A search for news articles doesn't bring up anything. Subject fails to meet the general notability guideline.--xanchester (t) 02:56, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Absolutely zero evidence of use aside from the one WordPress blog despite searches with both Google News and Books. SwisterTwister talk 05:18, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:24, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:24, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The article grossly misreads the coiner's intent! —Tamfang (talk) 19:04, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Xanchester, and as a fork of crowdsourcing and astroturfing. Bearian (talk) 19:22, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.