Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Framework for the Future
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:15, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Framework for the Future (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This is merely a summary of a report, and there is no notability asserted for the report itself. Wikipedia is not meant to be a place to summarize primary sources. ZimZalaBim talk 14:41, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:22, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:22, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No evidence of notability, completely unencyclopaedic. Should someone find reasons for notability, reduce to stub unless someone wants to rewirte this Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 17:41, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Original research; the contents of the article, apparently a summary of a vague and bollocksy white paper about the future of public libraries in the UK, do not relate obviously to the title. Contains a great deal of prose that's vague to the point of meaninglessness: Framework for the Future provides ideas for national reach programmes on pages thirty-five to thirty-six. These are: hosting communities, culture online, national content, alliances with broadcasters, information services, and online learning. These ideas are linked thematically to other aspects of the Framework for the Future document. For example alliances with broadcasters is linked to the desire for public library services to develop partnerships with outside agencies; whilst the online learning example is a cross over between the first area of target activity: the promotion of reading and learning. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:25, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.