Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flexiant
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:11, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Flexiant (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:ORG. Schierbecker (talk) 12:38, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 12:42, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Software and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:19, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Added additional findsources above for the company's other names. A 2021 press release indicates the company was eventually acquired by an Affluence Corporation, but there is no article to serve as an ATD target. There is also a related FlexiScale article on the company's main product, but its future would probably merit a separate discussion. AllyD (talk) 08:27, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete fair nom’s argument. The company’s current state of sources available and web search won’t allow meet the WPNCORP Dirubii Olchoglu (talk) 11:20, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete This is a company therefore GNG/WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. HighKing++ 21:38, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Searches are not finding the coverage needed to demonstrate that this firm attained notability. AllyD (talk) 06:16, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.