Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fight Ready

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:36, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fight Ready

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cassiopeia talk 22:52, 20 January 2022 (UTC) Subject is a mixed martial arts gym. Most of the sources are from UFC which is not and independent sources for the owner of the gym are related/affiliated to UFC. The rest of the sources are about other fighters, the owner and interview pieces instead of the gym/company which either make the source not independent or relevant. The article fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. Cassiopeia talk 22:53, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Cassiopeia talk 22:52, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Cassiopeia talk 22:52, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. Cassiopeia talk 22:52, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - If it helps, I have removed all UFC.com sources and replaced them.-Imcdc (talk) 02:31, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak ~~Keep~~Delete see two sources that qualify to meet WP:GNG which is pretty weak, given the sources are local and/or in a source I can't verify as reliable. It has had some notable people train there, but that falls under WP:NOTINHERITED, although it does say something about the quality of gym. Papaursa (talk) 04:15, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I went back and reviewed the sources and decided they weren't quite up to WP's requirements. Papaursa (talk) 20:44, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:42, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nom. Sources do not meet WP:ORGDEPTH. ––FormalDude talk 15:30, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Scott Peters (American football) as it involves him. It has the added advantage that his page is currently sparse.Gusfriend (talk) 07:33, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 05:31, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a gym therefore a corporation/organization. WP:NCORP requires multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. What we have here are a lot of sources where the gym is mentioned-in-passing due to one or other of their members or based on people affiliated with the company. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and I have been unable to find any references that meet NCORP criteria, topic fails WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 12:29, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.