Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Femtanyl

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 04:50, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Femtanyl

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I enjoy femtanyl's music, but this article does not cite sources demonstrating that the general notability guideline is met - it only has unreliable user-generated sources. HotNewHipHop and Pitchfork have covered the artist, but HNHH does not provide significant coverage of the artist's career/artistry as a whole, and the only source that perhaps contributes to notability to a slight extent is the Pitchfork review. Other than these two articles, a Google News search turns up passing mentions or affiliated tour listings; nothing else of value has been found in other searches. There's already a draft, so the article is not draftifiable. ObserveOwl (talk) 03:04, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, and Canada. ObserveOwl (talk) 03:04, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I tried a .ca website/news search, nothing turns up, a few concert listings. Not quite enough even with the two reviews mentioned above. Lack of sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 13:25, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Didn't know there was a draft already, sorry! Gaming gamer 9001 (talk) 13:43, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Fentanyl and slap a incorrect spelling tag as an ATD (potential search term) per nom. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 16:03, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Content suggests only passing coverage.ash (talk) 03:55, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per lack of significant coverage. Madeleine (talk) 03:21, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.