Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feminists: What Were They Thinking?

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Closing a day early as a result of the overwhelming "Keep" Consensus. Snow Keep as a result of clear establishment that the subject meets the WP:GNG (non-admin closure) AmericanAir88^(talk) 16:01, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Feminists: What Were They Thinking?

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Other than the Daily Dot review, no other significant reviews (the other review is from a student newspaper). Doesn't meet WP:NFILM, or WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:25, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:25, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Even just Googling "Feminists: What Were They Thinking?" at Google News shows there's more coverage than just Daily Dot. Onel5969, can you please try merge/redirect discussions before jumping to AfD? Even if the subject is deemed not notable, redirecting to List of original films distributed by Netflix would be better than deleting. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 16:30, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. A quick search turns up reviews, the Kickstarter page, even reviews of the trailer. Meets WP:GNG imho. Gleeanon409 (talk) 16:40, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I was able to find lots of other coverage in reliable sources besides The Daily Dot: Decider (website) [1], The Namibian [2], The Daily Nebraskan [3],Missoulian [4], People's World [5], Common Sense Media [6]. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 20:28, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the article needs fleshing out, but that's clearly possible. The film is notable; the many people interviewed are certainly notable; the sources exist. It just needs some time for editors to work on it. - CorbieV ^☊ ☼ 01:16, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as has coverage in reliable sources, fir example Rotten Tomatoes shows five critic's reviews including the Sydney Morning Herald a reliable Australian press which shows the film has had a wide impact, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 22:02, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as in my opinion it meets WP:GNG. Have added some of the articles discussing and reviewing the documentary to the article. - Ambrosia10 (talk) 08:25, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - wish I hadn't added to it as this needs closing out as "SNOW". Not a great nomination IMO. Maybe @Onel5969: might withdraw it? Victuallers (talk) 09:10, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep just a reminder to anyone adding refs to please also add the refs to the associated Wikidata item for other languages, if ever they add an article. I know this doc was also fairly popular in the Netherlands. Thx Jane (talk) 09:40, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Clearly notable. I do not understand why this was even nominated for deletion. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 11:37, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.