Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Favian Vergara

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Notability has not been established in the article through verifiable sources. If it can be, then the article can be recreated. Ty 15:22, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Favian Vergara

Very beautiful self-portrait, but not a very notable artist. Kingturtle (talk) 17:18, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NOTE --New Kind Of Grey (talk) 17:22, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Several references in reliable sources at http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=Favian+Vergara --Eastmain (talk) 21:30, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 21:30, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 21:30, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. – David Eppstein (talk) 03:39, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless citations from reliable sources are added to comply with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 20:54, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Stifle. 4 pages of Google News hits shows he exists, but does not show he is notable. Since Wikipedia articles are created from secondary sources those need to be found before we can even assess that we have anything here. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 13:18, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.