Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FUNREDES
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. One of a series of problematic nominations. Any established editor is welcome to revisit if they feel deletion is needed. Star Mississippi 21:08, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- FUNREDES (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
no encyclopedic relevance is verified WP:ORGCRITE Alon9393 (talk) 15:49, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 September 11. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Internet, Latin America, Caribbean, and Dominican Republic. jlwoodwa (talk) 16:04, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
no encyclopedic relevance is verified
. I'm not sure what you mean here by "relevance". Are you arguing that this organization is not notable by our standard for organizations, WP:NORG? Liz Read! Talk! 06:10, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Liz The writing of FUNREDES is very bad, it is written as an essay or if the language on the organization's website is not consistent or neutral, which jeopardizes the notoriety of the matter, one could even affirm that there is plagiarism in the article created That is not notable, it does not have independent, reliable or well-known sources, just by saying that there are no sources that prove the relevance and existence of the organization. Alon9393 (talk) 14:59, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. No valid deletion rationale has been offered. Dclemens1971 (talk) 00:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Dclemens1971 As it happens, the FUNREDES entry does not have reliable independent sources, and it goes without saying that it does not have any references. I will use the example of the band. I will create a Wikipedia entry for an organization and I will not put references in it. You would be in favor of that initiative. --Alon9393 (talk) 00:13, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- The thing is that it doesn't go "without saying". Your nomination statement has to outlined a policy-based reason for why an article merits deletion rather than improvement through editing. I'm still not sure what you mean by verifying relevance. You can't just have a few code words in half a sentence, it needs to be a full explanation that also demonstrates that a through WP:BEFORE has been done by the nominator which this nomination also lacks. Liz Read! Talk! 04:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Dclemens1971, Liz What is a policy? Because no one has taken the time to explain this to me, it is frustrating and I have seen AFD open without this requirement. Alon9393 (talk) 04:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Dclemens1971, Liz I must assume that this Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IVNFIL AFD by IVNFIL was created and they did not follow the policies that demand so much of me, and my AFD, explain to me and excuse my poor English, I don't usually speak it much. Alon9393 (talk) 04:39, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Dclemens1971, Liz What is a policy? Because no one has taken the time to explain this to me, it is frustrating and I have seen AFD open without this requirement. Alon9393 (talk) 04:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- The thing is that it doesn't go "without saying". Your nomination statement has to outlined a policy-based reason for why an article merits deletion rather than improvement through editing. I'm still not sure what you mean by verifying relevance. You can't just have a few code words in half a sentence, it needs to be a full explanation that also demonstrates that a through WP:BEFORE has been done by the nominator which this nomination also lacks. Liz Read! Talk! 04:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Dclemens1971 As it happens, the FUNREDES entry does not have reliable independent sources, and it goes without saying that it does not have any references. I will use the example of the band. I will create a Wikipedia entry for an organization and I will not put references in it. You would be in favor of that initiative. --Alon9393 (talk) 00:13, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Procedural speedy keep. Nomination offers no cogent reason for deletion. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 16:26, 15 September 2024 (UTC).
- Rich The article still does not have sources about that organization, how can you maintain something without references. Alon9393 (talk) 16:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- At the time you posted this, there were two external links that provide some verifiability about the organization or article content. DMacks (talk) 17:42, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Rich The article still does not have sources about that organization, how can you maintain something without references. Alon9393 (talk) 16:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.