Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Lloyd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn It's official; I have the world's worst Google-fu. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 21:08, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Lloyd

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Roles include one-shot characters, recurring character in a short-lived Z-level sitcom, recurring character in a film series without an article, and some very very minor voice acting. Closest thing to a "notable" character is Charlie Calvin in the Santa Clause trilogy, and even there, his role in #3 is only a cameo. My main concern is the outright lack of sources outside IMDb; I have been completely unable to find any biographical info on him, and I feel that the lack of sources outweighs any notability per WP:ENT. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 05:16, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 06:07, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 17:30, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep My WP:BEFORE quickly found the one win and 12 nominations as an actor that meet the instructions at WP:ANYBIO.[1] A lack of sources might in some cases be better perhaps taken as a reason to add them,[2] but not delete because someone else has not yet done the work. However, as I am not the nominator, I'll do some work on the article. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 18:22, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speedy keep. Clearly notable per wp notability standards/refs in article.--Epeefleche (talk) 07:20, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.