Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EnergyMap.dk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:12, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

EnergyMap.dk

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I did a bit of searching and it does not seem to be notable Chidgk1 (talk) 14:57, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Websites and Denmark. Shellwood (talk) 16:10, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 18:22, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:27, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: After a short time as a site in its own right, this seems to have become simply a redirect to www.stateofgreen.com (a company portal rebrand of Climate Consortium Denmark) over 10 years ago, and then not even that. I am not seeing evidence that it attained WP:NWEB / WP:GNG notability. AllyD (talk) 07:31, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.