Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emobistudio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:26, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Emobistudio

Contested PROD. No indication of notability. Added references are all press releases or advertising article's that do not qualify as Reliable sources.A quick search found no article's that would qualify as a reliable source. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 08:09, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:07, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:08, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
delete A version almost identical to this one was previously speedy deleted as G11 advert... Twice if I am not mistaken. This has not addressed that problem, nor does it seem that the company meets the basic inclusion criteria as spelled out at WP:N and WP:CORP. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 03:34, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

delete no 3rd party sources to establish notability; created by single-article user; probable spam. Dialectric (talk) 02:19, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
speedy delete - clearly ad Paleking (talk) 17:58, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.