Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ellatron
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 19:16, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Ellatron (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
A non-notable piece of software for the iphone. Article was created by user:Omenie - the company that produce this product. Speedy requested as spam but declined. There are no google news stories on this product. Smartse (talk) 15:58, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom. Highest Heights (talk) 16:02, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 16:37, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not notable--Rmzadeh (talk) 07:18, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies if there's a standardized format for this dialog that I'm not using - but again, in Ella's defence, re. 'notable' - one of the world's leading - if not *the* leading rock keyboard player - has picked up this software, unprompted, contacted the company to work on improvements and is going to be using the software on stage for the band's upcoming world tour - does that not itself make the software notable? And where the synthesiser and mobile blogospheres meet - matrixsynth, synthtopia, palmsounds - there is a lot of interest, so they (as long-standing synthesiser people) seem to regard the software as notable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Omenie (talk • contribs) 08:52, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Google shows no indications of notability. The author, please take a look at WP:PRODUCT, WP:NOTADVERTISING and WP:NOTABILITY. — Rankiri (talk) 16:49, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.