Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eli Whitney Students Program (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Yale University#Admissions. — Wug·a·po·des 23:43, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Eli Whitney Students Program

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a program located at Yale University. The provided references are primarily from Yale.edu, a non-independent source, and the few RS available do not significantly mention this program. I recommend it be merged to Yale University. —Citrivescence (talk) 02:39, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 02:46, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Yale_University#Admissions. Feel free to take my !vote with a grain of salt, as I have a slight COI here. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 21:43, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Certainly a separate article is not justified, per WP:NOTINHERITED. Almost all the sources are to Yale itself, with a couple of brief mentions elsewhere. I am neutral on the issue of creating a redirect to Yale_University#Admissions. The program is mentioned in that section, so perhaps a redirect is reasonable, but I don't know if 'Eli Whitney Students Program' is a plausible search term. Nsk92 (talk) 01:56, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:40, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vaticidalprophet (talk) 21:27, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect Judging from the sources available, this subject does not seem to justify its own article. A redirect seems appropriate since the subject is mentioned in the target section. Modussiccandi (talk) 23:16, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.