Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ef EL
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was already speedily deleted by User:WilliamH. Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:29, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Ef EL (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
From the PROD, "Article does not appear to be notable according to WP:BIO. Couldn't find any reliable sources". The prod was removed without any reason by a SPA whose name is suspiciously similar to the creator. →Στc. 20:02, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete sources are a wiki, a blog, twitter, and a mysterious title - basically it has none. Can't find evidence of notability elsewhere. -- Obsidi♠n Soul 01:25, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.