Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EdTech Impact
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:08, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- EdTech Impact (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't meet WP:NCORP. Just some directory listings and brief profiles. Nothing really in-depth or independent to show the company is notable. Junbeesh (talk) 11:25, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and United Kingdom. Junbeesh (talk) 11:25, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete, it fails WP:NORG. Nothing in the references to show that it is even a promising organization that could pass notability criteria in the near future. Mekomo (talk) 12:30, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Technology, England, and Wales. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:27, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
- Delete: Sources are not reliable, fails WP:ORG. Baqi:) (talk) 06:34, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.