Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dwayne Buckle (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. henrik•talk 21:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dwayne Buckle

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just as with first nomination, WP:BLP1E. - Roy Boy 04:17, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Hasn't produced enough work of note to pass WP:FILMMAKER. There might be a case for him passing WP:VICTIM, but there seems to have been little coverage of the event historically, and WP:BLP1E applies. Yunshui 雲‍水 13:33, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:02, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:03, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - per media coverage. WP:BLP1E is a vague reason for deletion in this particular case.--BabbaQ (talk) 15:48, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep His awarded works as producer and director are enough for me to pass WP:ANYBIO#1. Cavarrone (talk) 21:53, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 20:29, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete per Yunshui. Not notable as a filmmaker, the other matter already has its own article. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:28, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Reading over WP:FILMMAKER... In this case none of the necessary conditions of notability are met. i.e not regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers, is not known for originating a significant new concept, theory or technique, has not created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, etc. Also does not meet criteria for WP:VICTIM and that matter is handled elsewhere.--MLKLewis (talk) 01:44, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per MLKLewis. - Jorgath (talk) 22:06, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: BLP1E is a "vague reason" to delete? Err, that is a black-letter notability guideline, and failure to meet its requirements is a solid reason to delete. As far as the subject putatively passing WP:ANYBIO, what about honorable mentions at minor film festivals constitute "a well-known and significant award or honor?" Perhaps we can revisit Buckle should he win a genuinely significant award such as an Academy Award, a BAFTA, an Emmy or receive notice at a major film festival such as Cannes, Sundance, Venice or Berlin. Ravenswing 08:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.