Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Trump and handshakes (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:51, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Donald Trump and handshakes

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no need for this article. Wikipedia is a encyclopaedia, not a news website. And why we need to create an article on what Trump does? RealStranger43286 (talk) 06:26, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Politics, Social science, and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:15, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: We are not obliged to write everything about Donald Trump but there are literature from 2017 to present talking about his form of handshake. Remember, our inclusion criteria is the GNG, and once a “neologism” (what do we call this?) meets that criteria, there’s no need to delete it. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 07:37, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: When it's the third AfD discussion, that tends to a key indicator that past doubts about the worthiness of the topic have been quashed. Here, aside from the voluminous news coverage, the topic is covered in four books/journals – so that's plenty secondary analysis. Iskandar323 (talk) 08:54, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Trivia + wasn't this deleted years ago? Kinopiko ^talk 21:39, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Read, WP:IDONTLIKEIT, WP:LASTTIME. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 16:07, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep sources cited in article clearly demonstrate a depth of coverage over years, establishing notability Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 18:40, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I hate that I'm saying this, but it's been a prominent subject or WP:CASESTUDY in multiple academic publications. That's just about an automatic guarantee in terms of notability. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 22:52, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.