Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Domestic Extremism Lexicon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:15, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Domestic Extremism Lexicon

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable report. One of thousands of reports issued by the Department of Homeland Security that don't generate significant secondary coverage in WP:RS, beyond one of two WP:PASSING mentions at the time. No WP:LASTING importance. Created 15 years ago, with no significant additions since then, pointing to its non-notability. Redirect to Department of Homeland Security. Longhornsg (talk) 21:37, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Crime, Law, Terrorism, and United States of America. Longhornsg (talk) 21:37, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Commentary in several books, here, here, here, from a brief search, likely more. The report apparently received significant backlash. PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:42, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per PARAKANYAA. Satisfies GNG. WP:LASTING is part of the notability guideline for events, and therefore does not apply to documents, which are not events. James500 (talk) 09:16, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep if the sources found are added. See WP:HEY. Bearian (talk) 02:05, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The sources do not strictly speaking have to be in the page, as long as they exist, for the page to be kept and I don't know why everyone at AfD acts like they do when that is contrary to policy.

I will probably add them anyway but why do people vote based on this factor when WP:NEXIST is part of the notability guideline? PARAKANYAA (talk) 20:57, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added them to the article as I usually do and expanded it a tiny bit (though it could be expanded much more). I feel like it should be more standard for people to add AfD presented sources to articles but I don't like people suggesting deletion on that basis. PARAKANYAA (talk) 00:11, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment this article could also be rescoped to include the second DHS report released around the same time, "Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence In Radicalization and Recruitment", as a lot of the sources discuss them together and they're linked to on the page. PARAKANYAA (talk) 00:15, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.