Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Divi Theme

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:09, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Divi Theme

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Came across this during WP:NPP and observed it's twice been redirected to WordPress and reverted, citing lack of WP:SIGCOV. The citations offered are merely the recommended opinions of individuals and do not constitute significant coverage of the subject. Consensus would be helpful here, with a suggested redirect back to WordPress as an appropriate WP:ATD. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:33, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:33, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:51, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:39, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete due to lack of notability/coverage. I don't think redirect is an option unless WordPress#Page builders section mentioning Divi is created. --PaulT2022 (talk) 20:48, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: An article on a Wordpress theme by Elegant Themes. The marketplace reviews provided as references provide basic verification but don't demonstrate notability (WP:NWEB / WP:NSOFT) and searches are not finding better. There is no article on the vendor company which could provide a redirect target and I think the WordPress article is too remote - and adding mention of this tool there would be WP:UNDUE. AllyD (talk) 08:29, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.