Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dita Garbo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 12:25, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dita Garbo

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NENTERTAINER, has so far been a participant in one series of a reality TV series, no WP:SIGCOV outside of that, so WP:SINGLEEVENT and WP:PSEUDO also applies. In the same way that we do not have articles for every participant on other reality shows (Big Brother for example), appearing on this show does not automatically assume notability. --wooden superman 08:41, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. --wooden superman 08:41, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:55, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - A single appearance in a reality TV show and nothing else is not enough notability.

Bit-Pasta (talk) 11:19, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and LGBTQ+ studies. jolielover♥talk 12:12, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.