Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dissociated press (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Procedural Keep. Next time write a more compelling deletion nomination. Liz Read! Talk! 23:18, 19 April 2025 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Dissociated press (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. TheAwesomeHwyh 18:37, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. TheAwesomeHwyh 18:37, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:33, 12 April 2025 (UTC)
- Keep. The article already has ample references to significant coverage in reliable sources, including The Jargon File and BYTE Magazine. —Psychonaut (talk) 00:05, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.