Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dewang Subil

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:43, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dewang Subil

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don’t think this is eligible for A7 but it’s a BLP of a person who does not seem notable to me, or at best falls under WP:BLP1E. Mccapra (talk) 09:10, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Pass WP:BLP. Person is notable. Billshine (talk) 20:45, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Billshine: just showing up at AfDs and saying “it’s notable” doesn’t help the community understand why a topic is notable. What is the basis of your view please? Mccapra (talk) 21:43, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 09:10, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 09:10, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 09:10, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 09:10, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There's no notable CV and Lack of independent and reliable references. Brayan ocaner (talk) 09:30, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:00, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not meet WP:NCREATIVE and lacks coverage beyond WP:BLP1E. -- Ab207 (talk) 13:16, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.