Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DenisDaily

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 21:23, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DenisDaily

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced and odd reading article (including irrelevance like height or a list of his pets) about a non notable youtubeer Slatersteven (talk) 16:39, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not sure why the BLPPROD was removed despite not actually having any sources, but here we are. Regardless, definitely fails WP:GNG. Jmertel23 (talk) 17:51, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The {{prod blp}} was removed by article creator in Special:Diff/867661620/867725392 and could have been added again, as the article is still unsourced. But, here we are, and that is not too bad since the article is a recreation after it was deleted under A7 on October 21st. Searches for sources returned nothing useful; subject fails WP:BASIC/WP:GNG. Sam Sailor 18:07, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I thought I would give the user a chance to make a case, AGF and all. As they have not done so I suspect this may be that (as I asked them on their talk page) this article is actually a joke. I think we can speedily delete this.Slatersteven (talk) 09:59, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Slatersteven: Just to make sure, I did not imply you had done anything wrong here. On the contrary it can be a benefit to take an article to AFD and have it deleted per consensus. In case it is recreated in a substantially identical version, it can be speedy deleted under WP:G4. Best, Sam Sailor 20:36, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 18:09, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 18:09, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 18:09, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Posting Minecraft roleplaying videos on YouTube is not "inherently" notable enough to entitle a person to have a Wikipedia article just because he exists, but there's no reliable sourcing present here to get him over WP:GNG for it. Bearcat (talk) 21:37, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.