Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dealpath

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:34, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dealpath

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the notability guideline for companies. Justifiably PRODded and deleted in July, but recently restored solely on the request of a company representative. – Teratix ₵ 02:24, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. – Teratix ₵ 02:24, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. – Teratix ₵ 02:24, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. – Teratix ₵ 02:24, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Written like an advertisement. Wikipuffery, yes. --Whiteguru (talk) 03:18, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Nothing but spam. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:58, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - notability, as required by WP:NCORP, is not evident.--Melaleuca alternifolia | talk 21:25, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per WP:NCORP is for multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Topic fails WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 11:35, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.