Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Legge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 23:56, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

David Legge

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:BIO guidelines. Additionally, the article's main contributor is Preachtheword-uk (talk · contribs), whose only edits are to this page, which seems to indicate a conflict of interest. Brainy J ~✿~ (talk) 18:08, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Brainy J ~✿~ (talk) 18:10, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Brainy J ~✿~ (talk) 18:11, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Brainy J ~✿~ (talk) 18:11, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete—Searching reveals no coverage of this individual in reliable sources. Subject appears to be non-notable. Livit⇑^Eh?/_What? 19:47, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:44, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete looks like a classic case of WP:COI evidently leading to WP:POV problems. Barney the barney barney (talk) 16:25, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Yes, please delete this page. I have no idea who originally set it up. I am the webmaster of David Legge's website and know him personally. I had to create a Wikipedia account specifically to correct inaccuracies in the original article - which had largely been lifted from our website (which explains the WP:POV problems), but added to (with inaccuracies) by the author of this article. David has no wish to be included in Wikipedia. Thank you. Preachtheword-uk (talk) 18:00, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the above, especially the wishes of the subject. St Anselm (talk) 20:55, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. COI and POV aren't reasons to delete, but lack of notability is.--Pointism (talk) 12:09, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- I vote this way with regret, but I do not see much that is notable. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:54, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.