Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Courvoisier (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 00:47, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Courvoisier

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deleted last year where it was shown nothing suggested any actual significance and substance for notability and that's what this is currently now, again with only advertising information and complete with professional photos; the history then shows 2 particular accounts involved with this and their other contributions suggest this is part of a PR campaign, not surprising considering that, although this may be sourced and informed, none of it takes away the noticeable PR and then the fact these said sources are in fact simply trivial and unconvincing. My own searches are then not finding anything but exactly this. SwisterTwister talk 23:45, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTRESUME, and nom. This is transparently an attempt to have us, a charity provide PR for a non-notable radio personality. Radio DJs are rarely notable, since there are just so many of them. Bearian (talk) 14:19, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete. as G5. There is even less in the way of sources than in thedeleted article, but much more puffery. This doesn ot meet the reasons for deletion at the previous AfD. DGG ( talk ) 23:28, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete local television figure.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:09, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:47, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:47, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:47, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above reasons. Aoba47 (talk) 18:59, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.